Zimbabwe’s latest fiscal idea arrives with a simple promise: from January 2026, banks and mobile money operators will withhold fifteen percent on payments made to offshore digital platforms. It is meant to close a gap. The argument is that subscription fees and platform commissions stream out of the country without passing through the tax net, and the Treasury sees an opportunity to capture what has long slipped by.
The idea makes sense in the abstract. It grows heavy once it enters the life of anyone who uses the internet for work, entertainment, communication, or study. A tax on paper is clean. A tax in a household budget is rarely that polite.
Governments around the world have tried to tax digital companies in the past decade, each with varying degrees of caution. The European Union flirted with a three-percent levy. Kenya settled at 1.5 percent. India introduced a two-percent equalisation charge. Economists have been arguing ever since about how to attach jurisdiction to digital value in a world where companies can sell everywhere without being anywhere. In most places, the experiments have been modest, even hesitant. A fifteen-percent withholding tax does not belong in that family. It is a blunt instrument designed for quick revenue. It is also a surcharge on daily life.
What makes the levy feel harsher is that Zimbabweans already pay a premium for digital services because the prices are set offshore. Netflix, Spotify, Google, Apple, Starlink: all of them charge in dollars. They have no interest in calibrating subscriptions to local incomes. A person in Harare pays the same headline price as a person in Paris even though their wages differ by an ocean. Economists preserve themselves with jargon like “purchasing power parity,” which smooths comparisons across countries by adjusting for local price levels. PPP does not adjust a credit-card bill. It does not soften the moment when a student sees a new fifteen-percent line item on a cloud storage receipt. When the state announces a levy of this size, it is placing the weight on a number that is already too heavy for many.
The government presents the measure as a question of fairness. The logic is familiar: foreign platforms benefit from Zimbabwean consumers and infrastructure yet pay no VAT or turnover tax. It is true that untaxed foreign transactions leave the state at a disadvantage. The fairness argument becomes harder, though, when the remedy is routed through the consumer instead of the company. A withholding tax collected by financial intermediaries catches the money before it leaves the country. That is efficient from a revenue perspective and punitive from a household perspective. Consumers will not see Netflix, or Spotify, or Starlink absorb this cost. The fee will arrive in the bank’s notification message, as if delivered by the taxman himself.
There are deeper stakes here. Digital participation is not a luxury anymore. It is a basic condition of work, culture, and even citizenship. When a teenager in Highfield watches a tutorial on YouTube, the act is not frivolous. It is education. When a woman in Chitungwiza uses a rideshare app at night, it is safety. When a freelancer in Bulawayo uploads files to a foreign client, it is survival. Each of these acts travels through a platform headquartered somewhere safe and wealthy. Each is priced in a currency that reflects none of our economic constraints. Adding a fifteen-percent cut to these transactions feels like a tax on modern life.
Are you enjoying reading this post? Receive Notifications via email when new articles are published
Other countries signal a way forward, though none are perfect. Kenya’s low rate captures revenue without destroying digital affordability. The European debates, for all their bureaucratic sprawl, show that tax authorities can target the largest tech companies directly rather than intercept every small consumer transaction. Some jurisdictions set thresholds so that tiny payments do not get caught in the net. These ideas are far from revolutionary; they are simple design decisions that soften the impact on ordinary people. Zimbabwe’s current proposal does not attempt such nuance.
A different conversation is needed, one that asks whether this tax will raise money at the expense of long-term digital development. There is little value in a policy that brings in revenue for two years while pushing people offline for ten. A country that dreams of tech hubs and digital entrepreneurship cannot afford to make basic access feel like a privilege. It cannot tax the ladder and still expect people to climb.
The Treasury wants to broaden the tax base. The goal is valid. The method feels rushed. A measured levy, indexed thresholds, exemptions for education and health, and a requirement that larger platforms register and remit directly would keep the system honest without punishing anyone trying to stay connected. These tools exist. They demand patience and a willingness to confront the platforms rather than the people who use them.
The problem we face is not digital companies escaping tax. It is the mismatch between global pricing and local power. A fifteen-percent withholding tax widens that gap instead of narrowing it. It becomes another quiet cost of living in a country where every month brings a new invoice, a new surcharge, a new reminder that modernity can be expensive. At some point, the question stops being technical. It becomes moral: how much should a country charge its citizens for the simple act of joining the world?
Zimbabwe’s digital future depends on how we answer that question.
Did you enjoy reading this post? Receive Notifications via email when new articles are published
Latest Articles
- IshowSpeed coming to ZimbabweMarondera – Darren Jason Watkins Jr., the American internet personality better known as IShowSpeed, is expected to visit Zimbabwe as part of an ambitious tour spanning 20 African countries, a move that signals a growing shift in how global digital culture engages with the continent. Watkins, just 20 years old, has become one of the most influential livestreamers of his generation, commanding tens of millions …
- Us vs ThemThere’s no “us.” There’s no “them.” There’s only the comfort of pretending there is. People need enemies the way lungs need air. Conflict gives meaning to the meaningless.Without opposition, identity collapses. So we build one. We draw lines on maps, then forget who drew them. Every tribe begins as fear, then calls itself culture.We love belonging because it saves us from thinking.It’s easier to chant …
- We Turned Horniness Into An IndustryLet me explain this slowly, because if you blinked for five minutes in June, you might’ve missed the moment humanity officially gave up pretending it had standards. An actress, Sydney Sweeney, famous, attractive, very online-adjacent, partnered with a men’s grooming company called Dr Squatch to release a limited-edition bar of soap. Five thousand bars. Eight dollars each. And the marketing hook, the thing that made …
- Smoke ScreensThe Epstein Files were supposed to be a revelation.A ledger of the powerful written in ink, not whispers.Promises were made. Promises were repeated.They claimed the truth would come out.The fog would lift.Transparency was the campaign slogan. Then the files arrived.And almost everything was blank.Pages upon pages covered in black boxes.Names, conversations, details, gone.Block after block of censorship.Critics call it about 90 percent redacted. That is …
- The Redacted States Of AmericaThey finally released the Epstein files. And by “released,” I mean they handed the public a stack of black rectangles wrapped in patriotic bullshit and said, ‘here you go, transparency.’ Not truth, mind you. Not accountability either. Transparency cosplay. The kind where the light technically passes through, but you still can’t see a fucking thing. Page after page after page looks like it lost a …
- We Cant Have Shit AnymoreSomewhere out there, a very tired underpaid FBI agent had to write a sentence that would’ve sounded insane just ten years ago. “Criminals may use AI-generated images to fake kidnappings and demand ransom.” That sentence alone should qualify us for a species-wide timeout. And of course the internet did what the internet does and immediately joked about how this will disrupt the real kidnapping industry. …
- Africa is The New Cold War FrontYou ever feel like the whole damn planet suddenly remembered Africa exists. Not because they actually give a shit about Africans, but because the minerals are running low everywhere else and China has been scooping up the continent like it’s a Black Friday sale? Because that’s exactly what’s happening. And now, out of nowhere, every global superpower is acting like they’ve always loved us, like …
- My Unorthodox Thoughts On The US-Zimbabwe Partnership ResetOh look! America and Zimbabwe are “starting fresh.” Again. For the 900th time. The U.S. has now discovered that Zimbabwe could be “a great partner.” No shit, Sherlock. Anyone can be a great partner as long as they have lithium, gold, and a government desperate enough to smile at whoever shows up with a business card. And the Herald is acting like this is the …
- The World Didn’t Sign Up To Be America’s Captive Audience (But Here We Are)Sometimes I look at my social media feed and wonder when exactly I became an unpaid U.S. political analyst, commentator or whatever. I live thousands of kilometers away, my taxes don’t go there, I don’t vote there, and yet every day I’m force-fed a steady diet of American political drama like it’s my emotional multivitamin. I open TikTok: screaming match between a congressman and a …
- America’s Love Affair With “The End Of The World”Some days I think the United States doesn’t actually want to fix anything. I think the country is addicted to decline the same way some people are addicted to astrology. I think that’s bcause it’s easier to believe Mercury is in retrograde than to admit you forgot to pay your bills. Everyone is screaming about apocalypse like it’s a sport. Right-wing apocalypse, left-wing apocalypse, climate …
- The Last Honest Word in ZimbabweLooking back, it seems strange that we ever expected truth to survive here. Not because Zimbabwe is uniquely cursed, no, but because we kept insisting that honesty could flourish in a place where every incentive favoured its opposite. Perhaps one day, when someone brave enough attempts to record our era with any sincerity, they will probably observe that the death of truth was not sudden. …
Zealous Thierry 