When Zimbabwe appeared on a recent global ranking of the best countries to visit in 2025, alongside Morocco, it surprised many casual readers. International press often paints Zimbabwe as unstable, isolated, or unsafe. Yet those who have visited know the truth is more layered.
Tourism in Zimbabwe has been quietly growing, and many travelers leave with stories of warmth and beauty. Still, a question lingers: is Zimbabwe safe for white tourists?
It’s not an idle question. The memory of land reform and political turmoil at the turn of the millennium still shapes perceptions abroad. In that period, white commercial farmers lost land, and headlines around the world spoke of violent takeovers.
For many who only know Zimbabwe through those stories, the thought of visiting raises concerns. Would a white tourist stand out? Would they face hostility?
The reality is more reassuring. Zimbabwe today is one of the most welcoming destinations in Africa, and the racial anxieties of two decades ago rarely surface in tourist settings. But answering is Zimbabwe safe for white tourists requires honesty, not gloss. Safety in Zimbabwe is not identical to safety in Europe or Japan. It is closer to safety in Morocco or Kenya: safe if you are sensible, unsafe if you ignore context.
Where the Question Comes From
To understand why people wonder whether Zimbabwe is safe for white tourists, it helps to look back. Land reform in 2000 was a defining moment. For decades, white farmers controlled much of the best agricultural land. When the state moved to redistribute it, chaos followed. Some farms were taken violently. A number of white families fled, and those who stayed faced intimidation. The story made front-page news mostly in the UK, Australia, and South Africa, because many of those farmers had connections there.
This created a lasting image: Zimbabwe as a place hostile to white people. That image persists even though it was tied to a specific moment, class, and group, not ordinary visitors. A farmer defending land in rural Mashonaland in 2001 is not the same as a German couple on safari in Hwange in 2025.
On the Ground Today
Step into Victoria Falls town, the main tourist hub, and you see another picture. White tourists, Black tourists, and locals move easily in the streets. Hotels and lodges are staffed by Zimbabweans used to guests from all over the world. Tour operators crack jokes in English and Shona, and vendors in the craft market push carved hippos and batik cloth with the same energy no matter the skin color of the buyer.
There is no evidence that white tourists are singled out negatively. If anything, white travelers may be seen as more likely to spend freely, which draws attention from street hawkers. But attention is not hostility. Zimbabwe’s economy is fragile, and tourism is one of the few reliable foreign currency earners. Tourists, regardless of race, are treated as guests who help keep businesses alive.
So, is Zimbabwe safe for white tourists in places like Victoria Falls or Hwange? The short answer is yes. The risks are less about race and more about the usual issues of petty crime and scams that exist anywhere visitors carry cash and cameras.
Comparing Zimbabwe to Morocco and South Africa
The global travel list that placed Zimbabwe and Morocco side by side offers a useful comparison. Morocco is famous for its bustling markets, tiled courtyards, and desert tours. But it also has a reputation for persistent touts, scams, and occasional hostility to tourists who ignore cultural codes. South Africa, another regional competitor, has world-class attractions but struggles with violent crime that sometimes spills into tourist spaces.
Zimbabwe sits somewhere in between. Visitors don’t face the same intense hustling as Morocco, nor the same level of violent crime risk as South Africa. In Harare, there are pickpockets, but in safari areas the most pressing danger is a curious elephant on the road.
When the question is Zimbabwe safe for white tourists is asked in comparison, Zimbabwe often comes out as calmer than its neighbors. The political system may still draw criticism, but the social atmosphere for visitors is more relaxed than outsiders expect.
Race and Perception
Race in Zimbabwe is complicated, but in daily interactions it is less tense than some imagine. Zimbabweans are aware of history. They know about colonialism, land seizures, and economic divides. But they also distinguish between political struggles and personal encounters.
Most Zimbabweans have hosted white teachers, aid workers, or tourists in their communities. English is widely spoken, and cultural pride often comes with a desire to show visitors kindness. A white tourist may draw stares in rural areas, but curiosity does not equal danger.
If there is any tension, it is more about class than race. Flash wealth, whether by a white tourist or a Black Zimbabwean, can attract some level of bootliciing or resentment in a country where poverty is widespread. But the resentment is about inequality, not skin color.
So when people ask is Zimbabwe safe for white tourists, they are really asking whether old political scars will shape everyday behavior. In most tourist contexts, the answer is no. Tourists are guests, not participants in the historical land debate.
Where Caution Is Needed
To reassure does not mean to pretend Zimbabwe is without risks. Tourists, white or otherwise, need to stay aware.
Urban safety: Harare and Bulawayo are generally fine by day, but walking alone at night, especially downtown, is unwise. They are a rare one in a million occurances, but opportunistic muggings may happen. You never know.
Transport: Long-distance buses can be chaotic. Registered Taxis are safer than unregulated kombis.
Police stops: Roadblocks have decreased but still exist. Bribes are less common than in the past especially for tourists, but confusion over documents can happen. Tourists usually pass without issue.
Political gatherings: Protests are rare but should be avoided if they occur. As is any country
Wildlife areas: The real danger in the bush is from animals. Respect park rules, don’t wander at night, and listen to guides.
These are standard travel cautions. None are specific to white tourists, there aren’t any specific to race.
Voices of Tourists
Travel forums reveal a pattern. Many white tourists arrive nervous, then leave surprised at how safe and welcome they felt. On TripAdvisor and Lonely Planet boards, visitors write about the friendliness of locals, the professionalism of safari guides, and the sense of calm compared to other destinations.
A British traveler described walking around Victoria Falls alone, finding people helpful and curious. An Australian family reported that locals treated their children with affection, offering small gifts and greetings. An American couple who self-drove to Mana Pools said they faced more trouble from flat tires than from people.
The repeated refrain: “I was worried before coming, but I felt safe once I was there.”
Are you enjoying reading this post? Receive Notifications via email when new articles are published
The Economic Dimension
Zimbabwe’s economy has struggled for years. Hyperinflation, unemployment, and currency crises have shaped daily life. In that context, tourism is lifeblood. Victoria Falls in particular depends on international arrivals. Hotels, guides, and craft sellers rely on the spending power of visitors.
Because of this, there is a strong incentive to keep tourists safe and happy. The government and local communities both know that one ugly incident could spread online and undo years of effort. This economic dependency acts as a shield for visitors.
So when the phrase is Zimbabwe safe for white tourists comes up, the overlooked truth is that Zimbabwe has practical reasons to ensure the answer is yes. Safety is not just goodwill but survival for us.
My Reflections
As a Zimbabwean, the question is Zimbabwe safe for white tourists lands in a complicated space. On one hand, it stirs frustration. It suggests that race relations here are defined only by conflict. On the other hand, it is fair for outsiders to ask. They carry the baggage of news headlines and family caution.
The truth is simpler: most Zimbabweans want tourists, of any race, to feel at home. We are proud of our landscapes, our history, and our culture. Visitors allow us to show that Zimbabwe is more than its political crises.
White tourists are not a curiosity anymore. They have been coming for decades, and their presence blends easily with the safari trucks, the river cruises, and the lodge verandas. The real question is not about race but about whether Zimbabwe can keep building stability so all tourists Black, white, or otherwise, can enjoy it without fear.
Conclusion: Is Zimbabwe Safe for White Tourists?
So, let’s return to the question of the day: is Zimbabwe safe for white tourists?
Yes, Zimbabwe is safe for white tourists. It is as safe as most other African travel hotspots, and in some ways calmer. Visitors are welcomed, not resented. Risks exist, but they are tied to common-sense travel caution, not to skin color.
What Zimbabwe offers in return is unforgettable: the spray of Victoria Falls at sunset, the quiet of Hwange’s elephants at dusk, the ancient stones of Great Zimbabwe at dawn. To miss these experiences because of outdated fears is to let old headlines steal present joys.
Zimbabwe deserves to be seen not through the lens of past conflict, but through the eyes of today’s traveler. And the honest answer to the question, is Zimbabwe safe for white tourists, is yes.
Did you enjoy reading this post? Receive Notifications via email when new articles are published
Latest Articles
- The New Monroe Doctrine: How Washington Is Rewriting Sovereignty in the Age of Resource PoliticsFor months, US President Donald Trump has insisted his administration’s campaign in Venezuela is a counter-narcotics mission. Washington’s talking points lean heavily on the fentanyl crisis, the need for decisive action, the dangers of “transnational criminal networks.” Yet the U.S. State Department’s own 2025 report names Mexico and China as the only significant fentanyl sources affecting the United States. The document is explicit. The drug …
- A Century of Intervention: How U.S.–Venezuela Relations Slowly Boiled Into the 2025 Airspace StandoffIf you were to trace the arc of U.S.–Venezuela relations, the current drama unfolding over the Caribbean skies does not appear as an isolated provocation. It resembles the final bead on a long, heavy necklace of misunderstandings, miscalculations, and ambitions stretching back more than a century. The decision by former President Donald J. Trump in yesterday to declare Venezuelan airspace “closed” may be dramatic, but …
- When a New Currency Asks Old QuestionsViews The arrival of a new currency is always a public event, but it is rarely only about economics. The ZiG entered Zimbabwe’s daily life with a mixture of curiosity, caution and quiet fatigue. People lined up at banks. Others waited to see if shop prices would move. Most simply kept using whatever currency they trusted. A new note in a wallet can feel hopeful. …
- Dollars, Data, and the New TaxmanZimbabwe’s latest fiscal idea arrives with a simple promise: from January 2026, banks and mobile money operators will withhold fifteen percent on payments made to offshore digital platforms. It is meant to close a gap. The argument is that subscription fees and platform commissions stream out of the country without passing through the tax net, and the Treasury sees an opportunity to capture what has …
- My Brain at 3AM Is a Dangerous PlaceI’ve finally concluded there’s something suspicious about the human brain. During the day, mine can barely manage basic tasks. Ask me what I ate yesterday, I mostly have no idea. Ask me where I left my charger and I’ll only find it when I get a new one. My brain operates like a lazy intern: shows up late, does the bare minimum, takes long breaks. …
- Oval Office Deals and Dismembered JournalistsUS President Donald Trump says Saudi Arabia’s crown prince knew nothing about the murder of Jamal Khashoggi, which is an incredible thing to say with a straight face. It’s like insisting the sun had nothing to do with daylight. And he didn’t whisper it in some hallway. He said it in the Oval Office. The room where people pretend to be serious even when they’re …
- On The Arithmetic of ShameWomen learn early that wanting something is a liability. Men learn that taking something is negotiable. That is the opening lesson, delivered without ceremony, reinforced without pause.
- On The Laziness of ThoughtPeople don’t form opinions anymore. They subscribe to them.Thinking is work, and work is out of fashion. Everyone wants ideas prepackaged and ready to post.The modern mind doesn’t chew anymore. It swallow everything and excretes is like worthless shit. Beliefs are now like streaming services: cancel anytime, no effort required. Once, thought was rebellion. Now it’s repetition.People mistake noise for nuance. They think conviction is …
- On the Inconvenience of TruthTruth doesn’t set you free. It just sets you apart.People say they love honesty, but what they really love is reassurance wearing honesty’s clothes.Lies have manners. Truth doesn’t even knock.
Zealous Thierry 